|
Post by Miranda on Jan 3, 2024 1:25:22 GMT
The whole series is available to binge.
|
|
|
Post by beverley61 on Jan 3, 2024 12:53:12 GMT
I know, that was fascinating. We could have missed out the bit from Durham to fit it in.
|
|
|
Post by Miranda on Jan 3, 2024 15:06:26 GMT
When she said there was the worst violence in British history and then they cut to somewhere else, I was most peeved!
I'd never heard of an African Emperor, never mind him coming here!
|
|
|
Post by beverley61 on Jan 3, 2024 16:09:22 GMT
Yes, the Roman decimation of Scotland is rarely mentioned. They had already been there and decided there was nothing they needed in Scotland that they couldn't get from England. Hence the wall.
The Scots kept fighting and raiding. So he ordered a decimation. This devastation changed the population make up of Scotland permanently. I think, and I'm dredging my mind here, that this is when the Picts in the North took over. The Scots disappeared almost entirely (most were dead).
I think the story that the Romans couldn't conquer Scotland and therefore didn't try, because the tribes were too strong is a kind of Walter Scott invention of the Victorian era - and it stuck, because it fit the trope of Scottish independence.
And when the programme went to Scotland I thought we were going to get a link in the story. Instead we got some earnest bearded chap trying to convince us that the picts had a big Fort above the snow line that they lived in all year. Very likely. That would have been stupid. They would have had other forts for the winter, when typically there was very little fighting going on.
|
|
|
Post by Miranda on Jan 3, 2024 16:17:21 GMT
Yeah, it's a real shame no-one has done a documentary on what happened in Scotland. As for that fort, I can't see anyone living up there in the winter.
|
|
|
Post by beverley61 on Jan 3, 2024 16:39:34 GMT
Had a brain burst. Nobody knows what any of the tribes were actually called. We only know what the Romans called them.
It was the Caledonia they most likely decimated. Although all modern Scottish historians dispute it and it is nigh on impossible to find one who even favours it. It was historically a fact for centuries, but is not in fashion now. Still the Picti survived and the Scotti came over from Ireland and filled the gaps the Caledonia had left. If the Romans didn't decimate the Caledonia then it's unlikely the Scotti would've been able to take the land, because there is no evidence the Picts did it.
Of course the Romans were in Scotland. They even built the Antonine Wall about 150 miles north of Hadrian's Wall.
Only the fall of the Roman Empire stopped them ultimately taking over completely and by then apart from occasional raids nothing much was happening and trade was taking place. There is plenty of archaeological evidence of their presence.
The land between the two walls was run as Roman territory. Some think it was called Valentia. Others think that was what they named Wales.
Who knows.
|
|
|
Post by Miranda on Jan 3, 2024 20:12:57 GMT
Ah! So this Emporer causing genocide is not accepted history?
|
|
|
Post by beverley61 on Jan 3, 2024 21:17:06 GMT
He is, and he authorised the decimation. Everyone agrees there was a large battle in or around the Grampians. Nobody is sure who was fighting the Romans.
He was definitely in Carlisle.
Everyone agrees the Caledonia disappear from history and the Scotti invade from Ireland probably taking advantage of the confusion after the battle.
There is definitely a second wall. The Antonine Wall.
It was accepted history that there was an authorised decimation. However, because nobody detailed it, over time Scottish historians have watered this down to one battle and some raids.
Decimation is not just a word. Roman decimations were exactly what you think. They meant leave nobody alive. They meant genocide. They are documented in other parts of the Empire. If an Emperor ordered one, his army would do what he asked.
They may only have done this in the 50 to 100 miles above Hadrian's Wall. People may have fled, but there's no doubt many would have been killed on the way to the Grampian battle which the Romans won, and on the way back.
We don't know much about population levels in Scotland at that time, but similar to Northern England is likely. Mostly rural, with tribal groups, possibly moving around with the seasons.
In the programme she talk about violent times, the biggest loss of life. Perhaps historians are moving back to favouring early history.
Mind you some Scottish historians will still play with words e.g.
Were the Romans in Scotland? There was no Scotland then.
Did the Romans subjugate most Scottish tribes? There were no Scottish tribes then.
See what I mean.
|
|
|
Post by Miranda on Jan 3, 2024 22:44:50 GMT
Ah. This is the problem with history. It often includes the historian's prejudices.
|
|
|
Post by beverley61 on Jan 4, 2024 13:11:21 GMT
I lifted that last bit from CBeebies History Bitesize and that is actually what the Scottish Historian was saying.
|
|
|
Post by beverley61 on Jan 4, 2024 21:03:17 GMT
On tonight's programme you could tell all of them wanted to say that the young man buried in the centre of the banjo enclosure was an Iron Age human sacrifice but none of them wanted to be the first or to say it on camera!
I loved the fish trap.
|
|
|
Post by Miranda on Jan 4, 2024 21:46:33 GMT
It's become a proper cliche, hasn't it?
|
|
|
Post by beverley61 on Jan 5, 2024 7:37:23 GMT
Well he's at the centre of the cemetery with the other burials and feasting debris around him.
Could've died from flu, but had to be high status even at 17 to be buried there. Of course he may just have been the first person to die when they moved there.
I loved the people digging up their garden.
|
|
|
Post by Miranda on Jan 10, 2024 18:16:26 GMT
Did you watch last night's with the Waterloo Dead?
|
|
|
Post by beverley61 on Jan 11, 2024 19:51:19 GMT
Yes, they've searched for years and now it might be that the bones were ground up to produce sugar.
If Prussian newspapers were writing about it in 1820 or whatever there must be some truth in that.
What we know is that they were buried in pits, which was standard for ordinary soldiers. Officers families had the option of bringing them home, but not all did, complaining about the expense.
Can you imagine the people employed to dig them up, and grind them down, people had some gruesome jobs in the past.
I knew that people stole teeth from the dead to make dentures, they were famous as Waterloo dentures. You could get almost a full set of young white teeth. Awful.
|
|