|
Post by Dame Bouncy Castle on Dec 2, 2020 11:46:05 GMT
The Call The Midwife Christmas special will premiere on BBC One on Christmas Day (Friday December 25th) at 7:40pm.
|
|
|
Post by Dame Bouncy Castle on Apr 9, 2021 13:31:49 GMT
The tenth series of Call The Midwife will premiere on BBC One on Sunday April 18th at 8pm.
|
|
|
Post by Miranda on Apr 9, 2021 14:33:39 GMT
Hmm.... I might watch the first one and see how I get on. I did give up the last series cos the writing was so bad.
|
|
|
Post by beverley61 on Apr 9, 2021 14:58:20 GMT
It's the dam GP. Having known quite a lot over time I find it hard to believe that he supports every single campaign and so very earnestly applies himself in the area of human rights. 11 series and he still acts like a plank. Lucky his wife is the producer eh.
I mean he must be past retirement age by now.
|
|
|
Post by beverley61 on Apr 19, 2021 12:06:31 GMT
Scream, the GP has found another cause to champion and wonder of wonders has got two patients on his list that are affected. What are the odds!!??
|
|
|
Post by sleepyp on Apr 19, 2021 15:32:36 GMT
Review in the i suggests only the diehard fans are still watching, no new viewers are likely to be picked up now I saw the last 10 minutes last night and nothing made me wish I’d seen the rest
|
|
|
Post by Miranda on Apr 19, 2021 15:42:49 GMT
I forgot it was on! I will give it a go and see what I think but it's likely to be the last one I see.
|
|
|
Post by Miranda on Apr 19, 2021 17:22:01 GMT
Yeah, I'm going to give it up. The writing is still really bad.
|
|
|
Post by beverley61 on Apr 19, 2021 18:02:58 GMT
Shocking isn't it and just not fathomable. GP has one patient with a deformed still birth and he has his wife trailing through back copies of The Lancet. I've got a system she says, err would that be trailing through back copies of The Lancet?! Oh, says he, it might be the BMJ and all she does is give him a coy look.
There is no way after one patient he would link this to radiation exposure. It wasn't until about 1998 that govts started to admit this may have caused the issue.
A GP like him working within the Maternity Hospital in the 60s would see quite a few still births and several deformities a year and I have no doubt would give the deformity as evidence for the stillbirth, as would the midwives.
Besides why is he working in the Maternity Hospital. By the 60s, if not the 50s, it would have been staffed by obstetricians from the NHS and he may have occasionally been on call, if he wanted to earn some extra money, but these hospitals had doctors sleeping in on night shifts and junior doctors on the rota with consultants doing daily ward rounds. They also typically had ambulances on standby outside with anyone who had any concerns being transferred to the main hospital before delivery if possible. It's London for goodness sake, not the Lake District, they had a choice of hospitals to choose from all easily accessible from the East End.
Apparently they've confirmed another series.
|
|
|
Post by vicky on May 10, 2021 11:24:35 GMT
Am I the only person left watching this?! I don't know why I am still except that I have watched every series from the beginning (and used to enjoy it a lot) so it has become a habit but it really is bad these days. It has become so formulaic and prescriptive. The writing and the acting are very stilted and the characters have become caricatures. It seems to me that it is nothing like it was originally and it's time it was put out to grass I think.
|
|
|
Post by beverley61 on May 10, 2021 11:45:00 GMT
The character actors have disappeared or their roles have shrunk to the point that they're barely in it. The GP and his wife dominate. How many times have we had a gay character in this - at least one per series I think. Yet, at that time most men would have kept this so secret their GPs wouldn't know and you did not need a written referral to a VD Clinic so I have no idea what all that malarkey was about. Even in the 60s you could rock up and make your own appointment and your notes were confidentially kept there and not shared with your GP. I know, I was responsible for the archives in the VD Clinic and they went back to about 1880 (beautiful handwritten script in big ledgers).
I would also say from experience that only about half of GPs were remotely sympathetic to homosexuals and women who wanted abortions or contraception. Even in the 1980s a survey we did in Wandsworth showed that only 65% of GPs would refer a woman for an abortion and of those 35% all refused to put up a sign to inform their patients that they did not refer for abortions in their practice. What they did was try to delay the process as much as possible so as to make it virtually impossible for the women to get one.
|
|
|
Post by vicky on May 10, 2021 15:47:29 GMT
It's become another example of present day values being shoe-horned in to a story set in a time when things were totally different. Showing things as they really were isn't condoning them or wanting to go back to that way of thinking and surely most people would recognise how different society and its values are now in comparison. This kind of moralistic and preachy approach is ruining historical drama for me.
|
|
|
Post by beverley61 on May 10, 2021 20:11:00 GMT
It ruins it. There are enough things that happen in a pregnancy or delivery and other community nursing conditions for them to be the main story with the other things being peripheral.
The GP has a cause a week. Yes midwives might have known if a woman was married to a homosexual if he'd been arrested previously but not otherwise. The older gay men that used to come to the clinic occasionally weren't men that were typically effeminate or in any way different in appearance or presentation to any of the other men. Perhaps one or two were more obvious. On the whole they had ordinary jobs that men of their class and education had, at least 60% were married. Most had never been arrested or had any kind of aversion treatment, they didn't hang out in men's toilets or underground bars. They did man type hobbies that allowed them to be with other men they knew. Things like fishing/camping/walking holidays, weekends away at the football. They never got found out or arrested.
Similarly women who had backstreet abortions mostly got through them well enough and had no problems afterwards. Lots of the practitioners were well skilled, careful and hygienic. They also talked women out of it if they felt they were too far gone or under pressure. Some of them were even midwives. Lots of GPs would just prescribe antibiotics or other meds and say nothing, some of them did abortions too and certainly not every death certificate had the right cause of death on it.
Some were evil and would deliberately sterilise women if they could, even if they were 14 - none of them got prosecuted for performing an unnecessary hysterectomy on a child. I don't think we've had that storyline have we.
In CTM there are too many storylines about these issues, nearly all of which end in disaster for the woman, which couldn't have reflected reality or nobody would risk carrying one out for fear of prison and women would find someone else. .
|
|
|
Post by marion on May 11, 2021 9:10:33 GMT
It's become another example of present day values being shoe-horned in to a story set in a time when things were totally different. Showing things as they really were isn't condoning them or wanting to go back to that way of thinking and surely most people would recognise how different society and its values are now in comparison. This kind of moralistic and preachy approach is ruining historical drama for me. I agree. The mother this week was hammering on the door and screaming about how her son was ruining his life one minute, and having a cosy, understanding chat with him the next. I can’t abide the doctor’s family anyway what with his cause of the week, ahead of his time of course. And this week we also got his nauseating son back. And if Sheila was so concerned about the conditions at his school, why were they sending him there? Ridiculous. Unless I misheard which I may have done. The other character that baffles me is Trixie who I assume is meant to be a paragon of a modern woman, with a satisfying career etc. But she seems quite daft to me.
|
|
|
Post by linseed on May 11, 2021 11:30:53 GMT
I suspect Trixie is being set up for another romance
The series has now moved into living memory for me. I remember the World Cup!
|
|