|
Post by marion on May 29, 2017 9:06:04 GMT
I enjoyed it! (I did watch with subtitles on though. That is my default position these days.)
|
|
|
Post by Miranda on May 29, 2017 9:51:31 GMT
We're only teasing, Cake!
|
|
|
Post by geometryman on May 29, 2017 10:17:39 GMT
Same here.
They've certainly made a good job of portraying the horrible controlling and violent world they live in, especially contrasted with the "normal" previous world seen in some of the flashbacks.
The interior scenes were rather dark. I guess there's an artistic reason for that - darkness in their buildings and darkness in all their lives. There was one scene where Offred in her dark room was silhouetted against light streaming through the window - meaning there is hope out there? (or probably I'm reading too much into it!).
A good start to what promises to be a gripping series.
|
|
|
Post by thecleaner on May 29, 2017 19:47:24 GMT
Bored out of my mind by it, lasted about 40 minutes.
|
|
|
Post by goodhelenstar on May 30, 2017 7:39:41 GMT
I found this visually stunning and horribly believable. I've liked the book for years though not read it for a while, but I do remember that it starts with Offred (whose real name we don't learn in the book), in her previous life, having her credit card rejected in a shop because the chip in it that identifies her as female has been deactivated. The same thing is happening to all women around her as they are suddenly unable to conduct their lives. Not as exciting as a car chase to the border but more insidious.
I gather the series has been recommissioned, which I assume means there is no denouement at the end of the first. I do wish they wouldn't do this with adaptations or indeed series written for television that have a natural ending (Homeland comes to mind). But Margaret Atwood is apparently still on board which is a good sign – she would certainly make her opinions known if she didn't approve.
|
|
|
Post by carrie on May 31, 2017 17:16:16 GMT
I've just caught up with this, I found it fascinating in a disturbed sort of way.
I've not read the book, it's one of those I never got round to, I might have to look it up.
|
|
|
Post by Gargleblaster on Jun 7, 2017 5:17:28 GMT
I've just posted on the "Broken" thread on BBC saying that I am giving up on it because after the awfuf events of Manchester and London Bridge/Borough Market, I'm just not willing to wade through more misery. Now the same thing goes for "The Handmaid's Tale". It is slow and depressing and I need something to uplift my spirits. Also, I'm fed up with seeing all those women wandering around wearing lampshades on their heads.
|
|
|
Post by cakewalk on Jun 7, 2017 7:32:58 GMT
Apparently next week, we will see more of Offred's life before the country came to be run in the way it now is and how her life, and USA generally, gradually changed for the worse.
|
|
|
Post by geometryman on Jun 7, 2017 9:58:11 GMT
Yes, including it seems the sudden declining of women's credit cards, which goodhelenstar points out above is how the book starts. The series is feeding us the previous world a bit at a time, which I think is good as it keeps the interest up.
This week we had a birth, with the Wife sitting behind the Handmaid as in the "Ceremony" (and, earlier in the labour, going through the same exercises as the Handmaid) - all pretty gross.
The Commander instructs Offred to come to his study - which is off limits even to his wife without invitation - to play scrabble as it turns out. Is he unwilling to play with his wife, or is it an intellectual activity which wives are not supposed to indulge in?
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Jun 7, 2017 11:35:03 GMT
The Handmaid’s Tale: Margaret Atwood and showrunner Bruce Miller (full panel) | BookCon 2017
Author Margaret Atwood and showrunner Bruce Miller discuss THE HANDMAID’S TALE and its adaptation into a series on Hulu. Moderated by HuffPost’s Madeleine Crum, and filmed at BookCon 2017.
|
|
|
Post by marion on Jun 12, 2017 17:07:17 GMT
I read this book when it came out, so a long time ago, but it seems to me that things are going faster than in the novel, and I wonder how much action will be added, especially if it is going to a second series. I also don't remember any FGM, but then it was about 30 years ago, but I didn't think they tolerated lesbians at all, not even fertile ones! Once they knew you were a gender traitor, that was it! You got banished or killed.
|
|
|
Post by geometryman on Jun 13, 2017 10:02:09 GMT
All in all this was a pretty savage episode to watch. The scenes from the past when the brutal regime was established, Offred's interrogation over Ofglen, the fate of Ofglen and her "Martha", and Serena Joy's treatment of Offred for not being pregnant were all quite chilling. Not familiar with the novel, but we can probably be confident that anything added will be with Margaret Atwood's approval as she's a supervising producer. She even appeared in a blink-and-you'll-miss-it cameo in episode 1 - it's in this "7 things you might not know...": www.radiotimes.com/news/2017-05-28/7-things-you-might-not-know-about-the-handmaids-tale
|
|
|
Post by goodhelenstar on Jun 19, 2017 8:00:46 GMT
Another brutal episode. That seems to be the pattern: the dreadful reality of present-day life for anyone who steps out of line, with flashbacks to Offred's life 'before' and the process of brutalising them all into submission.
The filming is stunning, with the solid blocks of colour representing the different castes of women and the men all in black (I wonder how it was that the Aunts became so dowdy?), along with the choreography of scenes like the Ceremony. The beauty of it adds to the horror of what is really going on.
|
|
|
Post by cakewalk on Jun 19, 2017 10:27:04 GMT
Am thoroughly enjoying this series (if 'enjoy' is the right word!) I'm completely drawn in.
|
|
|
Post by pearl06 on Jun 24, 2017 14:36:31 GMT
I too am watching this and find it fascinating. The pace is just right. Not too rushed.
|
|