Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Mar 30, 2017 21:53:37 GMT
Don't think it could be the convicted rapist who done the deed on Trish, much as I'd like it to be (smug git) but how would he know about the party that night? Maybe they'll get him for the others? My money is on Lenny Henry, he's besotted with her but then he may end up with her. Truly though I haven't got a clue really and this is what makes Broadchurch so brilliant.
|
|
|
Post by profbooboo on Mar 30, 2017 22:32:12 GMT
It is good, and I'm still none the wiser as to who it could be. There are so many clues implicating lots of people. I don't think it's the garage guy, Lenny Henry or Charlie Higsons characters as it's be too obvious. I think the owner of the manor house has more to do with this, like I said on a previous post, I've seen him in a few tv shows over the years so he's not a nobody actor, but he was very under used so I think they'll be more to come from him. And the sock that was found looked like it was from the football team, and it looks like a team of young guys like the people looking at mobile phones and asking to see Hardy's daughter! So could Ellie's son have more to hide than porn on his phone.
...I never thought I'd say this but I wish predictive text would not change 'porn on his phone' to 'pork on his phone'!...I was going to say something, but I'll leave it!😳
|
|
|
Post by geometryman on Mar 30, 2017 22:58:37 GMT
I too was a bit suspicious of the owner of the big hall where the party was. I thought it was all rather convenient that his dog found a sock - despite the police having earlier thoroughly searched the place - just after the cops learnt that a sock had been used as a gag, and that he would then think it was significant enough to phone them up about it. As you said, he could be deliberately trying to deflect attention from himself.
That cocky Leo was the main one of the footballers and I've been suspicious of him all along for the rape. However I'm not so sure now, a) because there's still 3 episodes to go and b) because of the very end of episode 1 (when we saw, I think, someone removing a coil of blue rope from the scene in a Farm Shop carrier bag - Leo wouldn't need to get such rope from the shop because it's one of his company's own products).
|
|
|
Post by profbooboo on Mar 31, 2017 3:03:33 GMT
Blimey Geometryman, are you sure you don't work with DI Hardy?!🤔😉 You're proper clued up, I never thought that about the rope. I might need to have a marathon session and rewatch it. I've heard some people watch it twice, back to back as there's so much going on in an episode and so many clues and misdirections you need to see it more than once. I think anyone that's too obvious it won't be as there's 3 episodes left, they won't want to give it away before the end.
|
|
|
Post by geometryman on Mar 31, 2017 9:28:18 GMT
I rarely re-watch whole episodes - generally only if I was failing to concentrate properly the first time around.
For a major mystery like Broadchurch though I record all the episodes on a computer (which has TV tuners) so I can re-check bits of them, and to quickly find when exactly those bits happened I extract the subtitles into a text file which can be searched.
|
|
|
Post by vicky on Mar 31, 2017 10:13:07 GMT
I rarely re-watch whole episodes - generally only if I was failing to concentrate properly the first time around. For a major mystery like Broadchurch though I record all the episodes on a computer (which has TV tuners) so I can re-check bits of them, and to quickly find when exactly those bits happened I extract the subtitles into a text file which can be searched. Wow, that is impressive. It sounds too technical for me...but then, I was never very good at geometry either!
|
|
|
Post by profbooboo on Mar 31, 2017 16:03:47 GMT
Too technical for me as well. I do tend to mess around on my computer while watching the telly but I think when Broad church is on I need to stop doing that!
|
|
|
Post by goodhelenstar on Apr 1, 2017 9:06:30 GMT
That does sound pretty technical! I always record programmes on commercial channels in order to avoid the ads, and often rewatch an episode, but simply fast forward till I reach the part I want. I usually keep all episodes of a series like Broadchurch in order to check earlier episodes if necessary.
As to whodunnit, I agree it's unlikely to be Aaron the convicted rapist, though his lying about catching mackerel is odd – what was he up to that night? I also think Lucas the taxi driver is being pushed at us too much and too soon for it to have been him, though there is that unaccounted for period when he wasn't where he said he was ...
Very curious to see where the Mark Latimer / Joe Miller story is heading. I do hope Mark isn't going to do something stupid. He's not a bad man, just a man obsessed and unable to move on.
Hardy's date was quickly dropped, wasn't it? I wonder what that was for, if it isn't part of the story. To show us he's trying to make a life in Broadchurch?
|
|
|
Post by geometryman on Apr 1, 2017 10:28:41 GMT
I expected to see more of Hardy's date. Her name was Zoe and I've been looking for evidence of her popping up in the cast again - haven't found any so far.
In the next episode Radio Times says "there's a bit more focus on the lead detectives' home lives", presumably Daisy then in Hardy's case.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Apr 3, 2017 21:15:31 GMT
Oh Mark! Well... At least Beth won't have to worry about divorce costs But what happened to Joe? Elsewhere the thick plottens. I think Ed's probably in the clear, now, because he's become too obvious. What is it on Trish's computer that's so vital? I assume Leo was going to clean its memory, but unless Ian has found someone else to do it properly the police forensics should be able to recover whatever he was trying to hide. Ho hum. EDIT: Oh dear, I've just thought of another possible link to Paul: although there's been no link between Paul and the rape case characters as yet, Ian is a teacher and Paul helps (or used to help) with IT stuff at the school. Could he have helped Ian out?
|
|
|
Post by pearl06 on Apr 3, 2017 21:38:51 GMT
I don't think anything happened to Joe. Mark couldn't do anything and {Spoiler} that is probably why he did what he did {/Spoiler}
|
|
|
Post by marion on Apr 3, 2017 22:14:55 GMT
At the beginning, when Mark and Dan are together, I thought Dan looked a lot older than 11. Or was he dreaming about what might have been?
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Apr 3, 2017 22:28:12 GMT
It was a "might have been" dream - Danny was played by the same actor (Oskar McNamara) who is now in his 20s.
|
|
|
Post by goodhelenstar on Apr 4, 2017 6:54:03 GMT
Yes, the final dream sequence of Mark and Danny in the boat showed an older Danny as well. I took it that Mark really was on the clifftop – a throwback to the image of Danny on the clifftop that we were repeatedly shown in series 1 – and the scene in the boat was a dream. I imagine we'll find out next week when his body is discovered, unless Chloe raises the alarm in time which seems unlikely (and in dramatic terms it would be better for Mark's story to end here). Terribly poignant, and beautifully played out, as was the scene with Joe. Two broken men with nothing to live for. No happy endings for either family, I fear.
The stuff on Ian's computer is sufficiently vague for us not to know if the police will be able to recover it, isn't it? If it was downloaded from the internet then I think they would be able to recover it, but if it was loaded on from a USB stick, say, then I think it could be completely cleared out, though if it was that simple he could have done it himself without all the cloak and dagger stuff with Leo the twine merchant. I'm assuming it's something that has been locally created / filmed, hence Ellie wanting to know where Tom got it from (if it's the same thing).
And yet more blue twine, this time round the veg – it's all over the place in Broadchurch!
|
|
|
Post by geometryman on Apr 4, 2017 7:05:36 GMT
I don't think it's as simple as just having porn material on it. Ian asked Leo in episode 2: "That stuff you did to the laptop I gave you... Can you delete it?". The phrase "you did", rather than e.g. "you copied to", makes it sound more like installing software - which would also fit with Ian not being able to remove it himself, and Leo saying "That's not how it works" when asked why he couldn't remove it remotely. I expect we'll find out in the next episode, but doubt we'll be any nearer finding out who dunnit - since Radio Times talks about "important pieces of evidence coming to light against all the key suspects".
|
|